[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: (Parallel) Iomega Zip and a Printer



See:

http://www.debian.org/releases/slink/running-kernel-2.2

... for a list of known issues when running the newer kernels on Slink
machines.

On Tue, 3 Aug 1999, virtanen wrote:

> On Mon, 2 Aug 1999, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> 
> A:
> > One way is to use modules, which I think most people do. 
> 
> Is there any doc available how to compile the kernel using just those
> modules (printer and zip-drive) so that it works effectively? (In the
> installation manual there is a long talk about that matter *why* compiling
> the kernel is done how it is done in Debian, but very little about that
> matter *how to do* it... :-))
> 
> B:
> > However,
> > I don't use them myself; if you have the latest kernel (2.2.x
> > series) you can have both your zip drive and your printer working
> > simultaneously, without modules and without any problems.
> 
> 1)
> Did you install the latest kernel with slink? 
> Any problems with it?
> 
> 2)
> Does the Zip drive  work then that way that the printer is attached to the
> zip-drive?
> 
> 3)
> What about then if I take the zip-drive off sometimes and attach printer
> directly to the parallel port? 
> 
> (In my case the zip drive isn't there
> always. I'm using it in two machines.)  
> 
> 
> -
> hv
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-request@lists.debian.org < /dev/null
> 
> 

+-----------------------------------+--------------------------------+
| Nate Duehr - nate@natetech.com    | Support Amateur Radio & Linux! |
| Private Pilot, Telephony Engineer |  Ham Callsign: N0NTZ           |
| UNIX Hack, Perl Hack, Tech-Freak  |  Grid Square: DM79             |
|                                   | "May the Source be with you."  |
+-----------------------------------+--------------------------------+
| HamRadio and Linux mailing lists available for interested parties: |
|            http://www.natetech.com/mailman/listinfo                |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+


Reply to: