RE: WHAT THE F**K!!! (Was: Re: Looking for right ISP)
Paul McHale writes:
> >
> > So, lots of reasons not to use Outlook. I'm curious, why do you
> > find it to be the
> > best available? What does it offer that, say, Netscape can't do
> > with a good IMAP
> > server?
> >
>
> Thanks for the reply !
>
> The best part of Outlook is it's integration. It works with my Pilot, has a
> PIM which is descent. My only complaint is it can't be minimized to the
> system tray. For me to try to switch at this point would be very
> unpleasant. It's lack of configurability is annoying. Otherwise it does a
> decent job. Overall, it is the best bang for the buck. I have looked at
> Goldmine and ACT!. Outlook has the best one stop application. Another
> complaint, as I type this email I check the performance monitor and see
> Outlook is using just under 10MB of RAM. A little steep for a program that
> must stay open ...
>
> paul
Real men use VM under XEmacs. That's integration. ( This is declared
war i think ;-) )
--
______________________________________________________
Felipe Alvarez Harnecker. QlSoftware.
Tel. 09.874.60.17 e-mail: felipe.alvarez@qlsoft.cl
Potenciado por Ql/Linux http://www.qlsoft.cl
______________________________________________________
Reply to: