[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: udma66 ...

On Fri, 15 Oct 1999, Jean-Yves BARBIER wrote:


> Hi all,
> I installed a 2.2.12 kernel and the hedridck patch for udma66;
> I had:
> 	append="mem=127M ide2=0x1e8,0x3ee,11"
> in /etc/lilo.conf, but I still have problems; detection is well done 
> BUT not for the good drive:
> PIIX4: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev 39
> PIIX4: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later
>     ide0: BM-DMA at 0xf000-0xf007, BIOS settings: hda:DMA, hdb:pio
>     ide1: BM-DMA at 0xf008-0xf00f, BIOS settings: hdc:DMA, hdd:pio
> HPT366: onboard version of chipset, pin1=1 pin2=2
> PCI: HPT366: Fixing interrupt 11 pin 2 to ZERO
> HPT366: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev 98
> HPT366: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later
>     ide3: BM-DMA at 0xbc00-0xbc07, BIOS settings: hdg:DMA, hdh:pio
> hda: Maxtor 91728D8, ATA DISK drive
> hdc: Maxtor 91080D5, ATA DISK drive
> hdg: IBM-DJNA-351520, ATA DISK drive
> ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14
> ide1 at 0x170-0x177,0x376 on irq 15
> ide3 at 0xb400-0xb407,0xb802 on irq 11
> hda: Maxtor 91728D8, 16479MB w/512kB Cache, CHS=2232/240/63, UDMA(33)
> hdc: Maxtor 91080D5, 10300MB w/512kB Cache, CHS=20928/16/63, UDMA(33)
> hdg: IBM-DJNA-351520, 14664MB w/430kB Cache, CHS=29795/16/63, UDMA(66)
> Floppy drive(s): fd0 is 1.44M
> Why does the 3rd HD's on /dev/hdg, instead of /dev/hde?????

because hdc&hdd are for two disks on first IDE ontroller,
hde&hdf are for two disks on second IDE controller and
hdg is what is left for you ;) 

what is the problem anyway?
just put the right drive into fstab and forget about it

> and why does the speed (hdparm -t ..) still the same than under
> udma33? (and I'm sure that udma66 is Ok on this drive, through the
> dos utility).

Are you sure that all the bells are on?

though i'm yet to meet drive which could saturate even UDMA(33)

> So, at this point, I must say: "AAAAAArrrrrrggHHHHH @@^|[{^#!!,"
> Thanks in advance,
> JY
> -- 
> Jean-Yves F. Barbier <jybarbier@wanadoo.fr>
>  [FORTRAN] will persist for some time -- probably for at least the next decade.
> 		-- T. Cheatham


Reply to: