Re: wu-ftpd vs proftpd vs ftpd
id avoid proftpd until they re write the thing, too many bugs in it's
core, unless security isn't a main concern. wuftpd has similar problems
but most of them have been fixed and i've seen no reports of flawed code
like proftpd has. i use normal ftpd (port from openBSD) i think i use
v20 (compiled from source) not very customizable commpared to the
competition but i want a ftpd i can run and forget about, and this is
it.(anonymous works)
nate
----------------------------------------[mailto:aphro@aphroland.org ]--
Linux System Administrator http://www.firetrail.com/
Firetrail Internet Services Limited http://www.aphroland.org/
Everett, WA 425-348-7336 http://www.linuxpowered.net/
Powered By: http://comedy.aphroland.org/
Debian 2.1 Linux 2.0.36 SMP http://yahoo.aphroland.org/
-----------------------------------------[mailto:aphro@netquest.net ]--
On 12 Oct 1999, Ron Farrer wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm trying to decide which ftp server to install. Typing "apt-get install
> ftp" listed:
>
> wu-ftpd 2.5.0-4
> proftpd 1.2.0pre7-3
> ftpd 0.11-4
>
> Which one of them is better? I don't want something that is going to puke
> on large files. Something that has lots of features to play with would be
> nice. User and anonymous ftp access is required.
>
>
>
> TIA,
>
> Ron
> --
> =========================
> = Ronald Burnett Farrer =
> =========================
> ------------------------------------
> - "mailto:rbf@magnesium.net"; -
> - "http://www.magnesium.net/~rbf/"; -
> ------------------------------------
> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> ! If you let Windows dominate, expect the worst: !
> ! "WORLD.SYS is corrupt, reboot UNIVERSE Y/n" !
> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????
> ? "How could this [Y2K Bug] be a problem in a country ?
> ? where we have Intel and Microsoft?" -- Al Gore ?
> ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-request@lists.debian.org < /dev/null
>
Reply to: