[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Voodoo Banshee + Debian => X == null ?



On Fri, Oct 08, 1999 at 09:35:47PM -0300, Tiago Alves Macambira wrote:
> 
> Hi Folks!
> 
>         Well, I just bought a Blaster 3D Banshee AGP and to my surprise
> - or not, since neither 3Dfx nor Creative Labs. are known as linux
> supporting companies - I discovered that it just can't get along with X
> -- at least not with the one shipping with Slink ( do I need to say that
> i use slink? :-)  and not with the last stable one listed in
> www.XFree86.org.
> 
>         It seems that 3Dfx has a somewhat beta X server supporting
> Banshee and Voodoo3 chipsets but, from what I saw, they are distributing
> it only in RPM format. Ok, I know I can use Alien and convert it to .deb
> but I'm doubtful of how debian-compatible will this E.T. .deb be and how
> will it behave in my box ( redhat and debian environments are not equal
> and, the installation script, thinking it is in a RedHat box, may screw
> my Debian box... not a GoodThing (c)  ).
> 
>         So, if anyone can solve my doubts and fears concerning the
> suggested approach of converting the package or has any other solution
> to this problem, PLEASE, e-mail me!
> 
> 
> []s
> 
> MaCa
> 
> 
> PS. I hope all that is understandable.. if not... well, I tried! :)
> 
> ---
> "I may be drunk, but in the morning I will be sober, while you will
> still be stupid and ugly." -Winston Churchill
> 
>     --==( Tiago Alves MaCambira )==- -==(     UIN: 5340883      )==--
>     --==(tmacam@fortalnet.com.br)==- -==(  tmacam@lec.dc.ufc.br )==--
>           --==(  Computer Science Student  @ UFC, BRAZIL  )==--
> 
> 
> -- 
> Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-request@lists.debian.org < /dev/null
> 
There is support in 3.5 I think there is a slink version out there......
-- 
*--* Mail: lawrence@otak-k.com
*--* Voice: 425.739.4247
*--* Fax: 425.827.9577
*--* HTTP://www.otak-k.com/~lawrence/
--------------------------------------
- - - - - - O t a k  i n c . - - - - - 



Reply to: