Problems accessing vfat directory tree and files.
Hi all.
Ive upgraded to 2.2.10 kernel a bit ago, and since then my windows
partition became 'isolated', that I could not access it at all.
I can mount it, and once mounted, I can read off the directory listing of
the root only (cd /windows ; ls), but once I go into anymore directories,
I get something like this:
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root root 1310760 May 11 2000 {.e36
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root root 1310760 May 11 2000 {.e36
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root root 1310760 May 11 2000 {.e36
dr-xr-xr-x 0 root root 0 Oct 15 2000 {.e37
dr-xr-xr-x 0 root root 0 Oct 15 2000 {.e37
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root root 51 Jan 14 2036 $.e36
dr-xr-xr-x 485 root root 32768 Jan 14 2032 $.e37
dr-xr-xr-x 485 root root 32768 Jan 14 2032 $.e37
dr-xr-xr-x 485 root root 32768 Jan 14 2032 $.e37
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root root 108 Jan 14 2032 $.e38
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 926232646 Oct 2 2014 .1if.gif.v(
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 942944326 Oct 4 2012 .400441.|)
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 893661763 Nov 5 2005 .5666899.04x
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 927086640 Feb 6 2004 .asp*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1094140725 Feb 6 2004 .cgi.{
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1161179443 Feb 6 2004 .cgi¨).$
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1111896112 Feb 6 2004 .cgiÞ
And a record in syslog appears:
Jul 9 08:43:42 Scorpio kernel: Filesystem panic (dev 03:01).
Jul 9 08:43:42 Scorpio kernel: FAT error
Jul 9 08:43:42 Scorpio kernel: File system has been set read-only
Jul 9 08:43:42 Scorpio kernel: Directory 1574323: bad FAT
The files can be viewed properly, though (only in root of the tree, since
thats the only place I can ls )
Please advise on waht can be wrong. I'm using libc2.0.7.19 with 2.2.10
kernel, bash version 2.01.1-4.1
In kernel, DOS fat 16, MSDOS and VFAT support are enabled
TIA,
Andrew
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Andrei S. Ivanov
Scorpio@hushmail.com
c680789@showme.missouri.edu
UIN 12402354
http://members.tripod.com/AnSIv <--Little things for Linux.
http://www.missouri.edu/~c680789 <--"Computer languages of the world"
My work in progress.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: