Re: NFS performance problems
Thanks for the suggestion. 2.2.10 also has better nfs client performance
-- I just tried it after a few hassles building a .deb to get
dhcp-client-beta to work on a slink system with the 2.2.10 kernel.
user time ____real time____
both kernels 2.0.36 2.2.10
compile/link 6 sec 30 sec 7 sec
many files read from nfs server
all writes local
NFS write performance from linux to the hp server is still bad. I may
try the 2.2.10ac1 patch and see if that helps things. I think Alan was
working on a write-gathering patch for NFS.
I hope you don't mind me replying to the list. I wanted to post a
resolution of my problem there for anyone searching the archives for a
similar problem.
I'm still not on the list, so if you have questions write me directly.
On Mon, Jun 14, 1999 at 07:29:37AM -0300, Mario Olimpio de Menezes wrote:
>
> Hi Lee,
>
> I haven't tryied yet, but new kernels (2.2.x) have nfs server
> built-in, which leads to a performance improvement. This is only from
> doc's. Maybe you should try this.
> My $0,02.
>
> []s,
> Mario O.de Menezes "Many are the plans in a man's heart, but
> IPEN-CNEN/SP is the Lord's purpose that prevails"
> http://curiango.ipen.br/~mario Prov. 19.21
>
--
Lee Bradshaw lee@sectionIV.com (preferred)
Alantro Communications lee@alantro.com
Reply to: