Re: Slink PPP with no defaultroute
Jay Barbee writes:
> Yes I do, and that [not overriding an existing defaultroute] is the error
> I got in the log about not over writing the default route.
That has always been the behavior of pppd, and IMHO it is correct.
> However, hamms pppd and now potato's pppd do not have that problem! very
> odd!
Do you still have a defaultroute to your ethernet? You almost certainly
don't need it.
> Do you know how this ability (or lack of ) is defined?
Compiled into pppd, so far as I know.
> Would it take a recompile of Slinks ppp package to get it functioning
> like hamms and potaots?
I doubt that would make any difference. Besides, if pppd-2.6 and ppd-2.7
are overriding existing defaultroutes, they are buggy.
--
John Hasler
john@dhh.gt.org (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
Reply to: