[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: primenet.com rejects mail from ibm.net



Prof. Feedlebom wrote:
> 
> First of all, why are you sending this to the Debian list?  *shrug*  It
> seems a bit off-topic.
> 
How and/or why did Branden's original message get to the list in the
first place?  Here's the E-mail header I have from what I assume is the
original message:

Return-Path: <debian-user-request@lists.debian.org>
Received: from murphy.debian.org ([209.176.56.6])
        by mx8.mindspring.com (Mindspring Mail Service) with SMTP id
rgthug.kem.37kbi16
        for <keithmur@mindspring.com>; Fri, 9 Apr 1999 23:38:55 -0400
(EDT)
Received: (qmail 30398 invoked by uid 38); 10 Apr 1999 03:38:29 -0000
Resent-Date: 10 Apr 1999 03:38:29 -0000
Resent-Cc: recipient list not shown: ;
X-Envelope-Sender: branden@ecn.purdue.edu
From: Branden Robinson <branden@ecn.purdue.edu>
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 1999 23:37:36 -0400
To: postmaster@primenet.com
Cc: postmaster@ibm.net
Subject: primenet.com rejects mail from ibm.net
Message-ID: <[🔎] 19990409233735.C19802@ecn.purdue.edu>
References: <199904100319.XAA19824@apocalypse.sequitur.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="KDt/GgjP6HVcx58l";
micalg=pgp-md5;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4i
In-Reply-To: <199904100319.XAA19824@apocalypse.sequitur.org>; from Mail
Delivery Subsystem on Fri, Apr 09, 1999 at 11:19:25PM -0400
Resent-Message-ID: <"oPL-CD.A.waH.0esD3"@murphy>
Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
X-Mailing-List: <debian-user@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/44206
X-Loop: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
X-Mozilla-Status: 8001


Nothing in the "To:" or "CC:" concerning the list.  Did you *mean* this
to go here, Branden?  How did you originally address it?  Reason I ask
is, I can't filter this sort of thing properly with Netscape Mail to get
it to my debian-users-list folder. 

(Yes, I've looked at RFC 821, but I'm still puzzled...)


Reply to: