[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: pine & mutt

I dunno about scoring--I rarely use the function, but I re-migrated back
to TRN when I realized that SLRN had no killfiles, what I consider to be
an essential tool in USENET.

On Sun, 21 Feb 1999, Steve Lamb wrote:

> On Sun, Feb 21, 1999 at 07:50:57AM +0100, Frederick Page wrote:
> > Well I tried pine at first (it did news, but not too good), then tried
> > SLRN, which was pretty good, but had no nice filtering/scoring. Then
> > I tried tin and it's IMHO great.
>     Aroo?  In what way is SLRN's scoring poor?  IMHO it is pretty much
> perfect and IIRC it had scoring before tin did.
> -- 
>              Steve C. Lamb             | Opinions expressed by me are not my
>     http://www.calweb.com/~morpheus    | employer's.  They hired me for my
>              ICQ: 5107343              | skills and labor, not my opinions!
> ---------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Pardon me, but you have obviously mistaken me for someone who gives a
email galt@inconnu.isu.edu

Reply to: