Re: pine & mutt
I dunno about scoring--I rarely use the function, but I re-migrated back
to TRN when I realized that SLRN had no killfiles, what I consider to be
an essential tool in USENET.
On Sun, 21 Feb 1999, Steve Lamb wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 21, 1999 at 07:50:57AM +0100, Frederick Page wrote:
> > Well I tried pine at first (it did news, but not too good), then tried
> > SLRN, which was pretty good, but had no nice filtering/scoring. Then
> > I tried tin and it's IMHO great.
>
> Aroo? In what way is SLRN's scoring poor? IMHO it is pretty much
> perfect and IIRC it had scoring before tin did.
>
> --
> Steve C. Lamb | Opinions expressed by me are not my
> http://www.calweb.com/~morpheus | employer's. They hired me for my
> ICQ: 5107343 | skills and labor, not my opinions!
> ---------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Pardon me, but you have obviously mistaken me for someone who gives a
damn.
email galt@inconnu.isu.edu
Reply to: