Re: Need help with new cable modem
*- On 20 Feb, Matt Campbell wrote about "Need help with new cable modem"
> Help!
>
> As of about 8 pm tonight I will have a brand spanking new cable modem
> connection to the internet. However, at this point it looks like it
> might only work for Windows 95, and this sucks. Is there anyone out
> there on the @Home network who might be able to help me configure my
> linux box to use it?
>
> I can tell already I have several issues to address:
>
> 1) Find a driver for the plug-n-pray PCI ethernet controller they
> installed. (Realtek RTL8029 - a really really generic card, the box
> doesn't even have the manufacturers name on it)
This is usually called a 'white box' version of a product and is used
by distributers and such, it doesn't have the retail packaging and
extras and is thus usually costs less.
>
> 2) Configure a DHCP client. Also, in relation to this, I may need to
> change my hostname to that beastly thing they assigned me... ugh
>
> 3) Pray to God. (Or gods, or goddesses, depending on religious
> inclination)
>
> So, can anyone give me any pointers?
>
> ______________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>
>
I have no experience here but have you read the cable-modem mini howto
and the dhcp mini howto? They might give you some info.
http://metalab.unc.edu/LDP/HOWTO/mini/Cable-Modem.html
http://metalab.unc.edu/LDP/HOWTO/mini/DHCP.html
I think the key thing for the NIC is to disable the PNP mode of it.
Usually this is done with a DOS program. If you cable company didn't
give you one then you will have to find one on the web or ask them for
one.
--
Brian
---------------------------------------------------------------------
"Never criticize anybody until you have walked a mile in their shoes,
because by that time you will be a mile away and have their shoes."
- unknown
Mechanical Engineering bservis@usa.net
Purdue University http://www.ecn.purdue.edu/~servis
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: