Re: kernel 2.2.0
*- On 28 Jan, Gary L. Hennigan wrote about "Re: kernel 2.2.0"
>
> So if slink is frozen, meaning nothing but bug fixes can be put into
> the distribution, how can putting 2.2.x into it be justified? Please
> don't read this as negative or sarcastic, I'm genuinely curious about
> the process.
>
Read the threads in the debian-devel archive titled 'getting kernel 2.2
into slink'. Basically slink is 2.2 compliant and 2.2 will only be
available as a source package and not the default image. Also with
slink almost ready for release it will be a nice PR move to be one of
the first Linux dist's to ship with the new 2.2 kernel in the set.
--
Brian
---------------------------------------------------------------------
"Never criticize anybody until you have walked a mile in their shoes,
because by that time you will be a mile away and have their shoes."
- unknown
Mechanical Engineering bservis@usa.net
Purdue University http://www.ecn.purdue.edu/~servis
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: