Re: current slink
I realize this is not conclusive, but I recently upgraded one of my
systems to slink with the latest libc6 2.0.7.19981211 without incident
(and subsequently to potato with only a minor problem (a missing
dependency in netbase) which was easily resolved.)
Bob
On Tue, 19 Jan 1999, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP DECRYPTED MESSAGE-----
> I am thinking about upgrading my system (at least libc, apt, and things
> like that) to slink from hamm. But I don't want to do it if slink is
> known to be broken at this point. Was the glibc version problem of last
> week ever fixed? Does the currently available libc satisfy the
> dependencies of all (or at least most) of the available packages?
>
> Any comments on the current status of slink are appreciated. I realize
> what it means to be running a frozen or unstable release. I upgraded to
> hamm shortly before it was officially released, and things went smoothly.
> I'd like some comments from people currently running slink, though, before
> I upgrade to something that's known to be broken.
>
> TIA,
> noah
>
>
> PGP public key available at
> http://lynx.dac.neu.edu/home/httpd/n/nmeyerha/mail.html
> or by 'finger -l frodo@ccs.neu.edu'
>
>
>
>
> --
> Cannot find public key 63196A05, signature not checked.
> -----END PGP DECRYPTED MESSAGE-----
>
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-request@lists.debian.org < /dev/null
>
----
Bob Nielsen Internet: nielsen@primenet.com
Tucson, AZ AMPRnet: w6swe@w6swe.ampr.org
DM42nh http://www.primenet.com/~nielsen
Reply to: