Re: why does the kernel suck up memory?

To: wacker@Physik.Uni-Dortmund.DE
Cc: <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: why does the kernel suck up memory?
From: <tko@westgac3.dragon.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Apr 1998 21:47:19 -0400 (EDT)
Message-id: <m0yM10J-0007zXC@westgac3.dragon.com>
In-reply-to: <19980402225912.17981@physik.uni-dortmund.de> from "Klaus Wacker" at Apr 2, 98 10:59:12 pm

Klaus Wacker writes:
[snip]

Thanks for you reply. Strangely enough, the original problem of all physical
ram being allocated was solved by upgrading the kernel from 2.0.30 to 2.0.33
Just wanted everyone to know 8-)

-- 
-= Sent by Debian 1.3 Linux =-
Thomas Kocourek  KD4CIK 
@_@tko@westgac3.dragon.com Remove @_@ for correct Email address
--... ...-- ...  -.. .  -.- -.. ....- -.-. .. -.-


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

References:
- Re: why does the kernel suck up memory?
  - From: Klaus Wacker <wacker@physik.uni-dortmund.de>

Prev by Date: Re: APT typo
Next by Date: kernel 2.0.33
Previous by thread: Re: why does the kernel suck up memory?
Next by thread: Re: why does the kernel suck up memory?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread