Re: emacs & xemacs
At 10:08 AM 12/9/1998 -0800, you wrote:
>Kent West wrote:
>>
>> Ever since I started with Linux I've wanted a console-based graphical web
>> browser, but kept running into a brick wall. Then I read that emacs could
>
>Uh, isn't "console-based graphical <anything>" an oxymoron? How could
>your ever expect to see graphics on a text-only display? (Unless the
>"graphics" are ASCII-art or some such thing.)
>
>ksb
Perhaps my terminology was incorrect. When I said "console-based", I meant
non-X. Like for example, Squake is, according to my definition, a
console-based graphical game. So, maybe I should rephrase my original question:
Is there any web browsers out that that don't need X-Windows that will
allow me to access pages that have frames and more importantly, allow me to
see in-line images, etc? I now know that lynx can see at least some .gif
files (I learned that last night, sort of by accident); perhaps it can be
configured to be more graphical?
Reply to: