[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: How to mount UFS file systems?



But it is INCORRECT!

mount /dev/sdd<slice> /<mount-dir> -t ufs

sda = target 0
sdb =target 1
sdc =target 2
sdd =target 3

sdd0 = target 3 slice 0
sdd1 = target 3 slice 1

etc



On Fri, 9 Oct 1998, Sanzo Miyazawa wrote:

> >From grep@shorelink.com Fri Oct  9 14:15:50 1998
> >
> >
> >If the UFS drive is, for example, SCSI target 3, it looks from the docs
> >like you would use the following:
> >
> >mount /dev/sda3 /<mount-dir> -t ufs
> >
> >Note that ufs is READ ONLY! 
> >
> 
> Thank you very much for a quick reply.
> 
> I get the following error message.
> 
> % mount /dev/sdc3 /mnt -t ufs -o ro
> mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdc3,
>        or too many mounted file systems
> 
> On the Sun, this disk (MO) was created to have 
> 	partitions whose sizes are
> 
> 	partition	a	0
> 	partition	b	0
> 	partition	c	all 
> 	partition	g	all
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> >
> >
> >On Fri, 9 Oct 1998, Sanzo Miyazawa wrote:
> >
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Could you please teach me how to mount SUN UFS file systems 
> >> in linux? (How can I specify a partition of ufs disk in the mount command?)
> >> 
> >> 			Sanzo Miyazawa
> >> 			miyazawa@smlab.sci.gunma-u.ac.jp
> >> 
> >> 
> >> -- System Information
> >> Debian Release: 2.0
> >> Kernel Version: Linux smp6m 2.0.34 #1 Sat Jul 11 18:07:08 JST 1998 i686 unknown
> >> 
> >> smp6m> cat /proc/file*
> >>         ext2
> >>         minix
> >> nodev   proc
> >>         iso9660
> >> nodev   autofs
> >> nodev   nfs
> >>         xenix
> >>         sysv
> >>         coherent
> >>         ufs
> >>         msdos
> >>         vfat
> >>  
> >> 
> >> 
> >> --  
> >> Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-request@lists.debian.org < /dev/null
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >
> >George Bonser
> >
> >The Linux "We're never going out of business" sale at an FTP site near you!
> >
> >
> 
> 

George Bonser

The Linux "We're never going out of business" sale at an FTP site near you!


Reply to: