[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Why hurd ? was (What is hurd?)



On Mon, 24 Aug 1998 servis@purdue.edu wrote:

 : *- Thomas Malloy wrote about "Why hurd ? was  (What is hurd?) "
 : | 	ALPHA	    SPARC   	i386 	HURD
 : | 	Which one of these things is not like the other?
 : | 
 : | Since hurd is an operating system and not an architecture why does debian release packages for it. 
 : | I thought DEBIAN was a distribution of linux, which runs on various hardware platforms.  I have no 
 : | objection to the hurd project.  It is quite worth while on its own merits, but  what does it have to do
 : |  with linux or debian?
 : | 
 : 
 : The Hurd is a kernel not an OS. My take on this is that Debian is a
 : collection of apps and their philosophy of package managment and the
 : DFSG.  The real name of Debian is 'Debian GNU/Linux', with the Hurd
 : kernel it will just be 'Debian GNU/Hurd' but all the top level will be
 : the same.  The package managment the DFSG, etc will be identical.  

In fact, it's conceivable that there could be a Debian GNU/blah release
for any system blah, though the non-freeness of many of those systems
makes that unlikely.

Imagine "Debian GNU/FreeBSD" ... that would send some people straight
over the edge.

--
Nathan Norman
MidcoNet  410 South Phillips Avenue  Sioux Falls, SD
mailto:finn@midco.net           http://www.midco.net
finger finn@home.midco.net for PGP Key: (0xA33B86E9)



Reply to: