[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: is the kernel worth it, what about Debian 2.0?



Hi...

I'm still running 2.0.33. The only thing noticeable in 2.0.34 was the
nestea patch, which I'm already protected against (somehow). Then again...

Are the Phrack 52 article 06 patches effective against 2.0.35?

Alex

On Tue, 21 Jul 1998, Shaleh wrote:

> Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1998 17:17:07 -0400
> From: Shaleh <shaleh@livenet.net>
> To: Keith <nfn11988@naples.net>
> Cc: Debian Debian User List <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
> Subject: Re: is the kernel worth it, what about Debian 2.0?
> Resent-Date: 21 Jul 1998 21:19:01 -0000
> Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Resent-cc: recipient list not shown: ;
> 
> Debian 2.0pre CD's can be had from cheapbytes.com.  The release of 2.0
> has been stalled by a recent change in X.  This should be fixed in short
> time and we should have a release REALLY SOON.
> 
> 2.0.35 has various updates for non-Intel CPU's.  Other little fixes.  I
> would recommend at least going to 2.0.34.  Grab the kernel source from
> ftp.kernel.org and use the debian kernel packager.  It makes kernel
> compiling a cinch.  I recommend againt patching from one kernel ver to
> thre next.  Something always seems to be messed up.
> 
> 
> --  
> Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-request@lists.debian.org < /dev/null
> 
> 


--  
Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-request@lists.debian.org < /dev/null


Reply to: