Re: xforms replacement
On 09-Jul-98 Shaleh wrote:
> At one time fltk was to be a XForms replacement. This changed. Darn
> shame. Seems the Windows support helped make it less X complaint.
I agree. I like the XForms look and feel. As it stands, most of my programs
will recompile under fltk. I just have a few that won't and one of the reasons
is the plotting...
> You can look at GTK see if it can help. I have a lib here called EZWGL
GTK, from what I remember, doesn't have and easy graphing mechanisim.
> for news purveyor, it uses the toolkit. Or as I mentioned, you can add
> to fltk. The author is very keen on people helping to make it a better
> lib. Several pieces were recently added by a few mailing list readers.
I know.. the author suggested that when I asked him about the xyplot..
unfortunatly, I know *NOTHING* about X programming. I can get programs out by
using the tool kits where I only have to understand C or C++ and not X.
----------------------------------
http://benham.net/index.html
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GCS d+(-) s:+ a29 C++$ UL++>++++ P+++$ L++>++++ E? W+++$ N+(-) o? K-
w+++$(--) O M-- V- PS-- PE++ Y++ PGP++ t+ 5 X R+ !tv b++++ DI+++ D++
G++>G+++ e h+ r* y+
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
----------------------------------
--
Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-request@lists.debian.org < /dev/null
Reply to: