Re: 2.0.33 is no good for lic6-dev ?
Rev. Joseph Carter writes:
> On Fri, May 15, 1998 at 04:11:46PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>
> Thr problem with OSS/Linux is that it grep's autoconf.h to see if you have
> the right configuration for module support and versioning.
Sorry I could not quite follow you all the way. Let's see if I got it:
since, in a Debian machine, autoconf.h is not at
/usr/src/linux/include, because it is at the kernel-headers (and not
kernel-source), then what happens? How did it get to think that
sndshield was compiled against 2.0.32? Or: was it compiled against
2.0.32?
How can I workaround this?
> This is STUPID
> and WRONG,
What is the right was, then? Maybe OSS people should be suggested a
better way, if one exists. I found them to be always very prompt to
help me.
> but then it's just one more example of what a shoddy piece of
> crap OSS truly is.
>
No offence intended here, but by your reference, then, the kernel
sound card support is a shoddy piece of sh*t :^> ... Let's make things
better...
Thanks a lot!
--
Luiz Otavio L. Zorzella Product Engineer
zorzella@conexware.com http://www.conexware.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: