Re: GPC

[Brian White <bcwhite@verisim.com>]

>  > This is a request for some feedback from current and potential users of GPC.
>  > I have GPC 2.0 compiled for hamm, built using GCC 2.7.2.3.  The next
>  > version of GPC (currently 971001) is in beta, but is already more stable
>  > than GPC 2.0.  There seems to be a few possibilities available.  I could
>  > package GPC 2.0, GPC 971001 beta, both versions, or wait until GPC 971001
>  > beta is released as GPC 2.1.  Let me know your preferences, if any, within
>  > the next few of days and I will then decide which course of action to take.
> 
>  I'd say package 2.1 beta, into unstable and 2.0 as stable.  Then
> update the beta package when GPC get's released.
> 
>  I have a few pascal programs, that would be nice to compile on Linux
> and I'd want to use 2.1 as it is more complete than 2.0.

Upload the beta version into "experimental".

                                          Brian
                                 ( bcwhite@verisim.com )

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Management should work for the engineers, not the other way around.


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-user-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .