Re: kernel 2.1.68/69
> > can anyone get 2.1.68 or 2.1.69 to compile?
> > hamish
> 2.1.67 had some changes to the installation scripts that broke make-kpkg.
> I've been watching the lists and I don't think
> anyone has noticed yet (except you and me). 2.1.68 has all kinds of new
> signal stuff that don't compile properly at all.
> 2.1.69 is said to be stable, though I haven't tried it myself.
I've tried 2.1.69 with make-kpkg without (almost) any problems. I had
problems to compile sound and umsdos modules but everything else works
without problems (i'm not sure if i've done everything right way but i
had Debian 1.3.1 and i upgraded ldso to latest version from hamm and
compiled ne modutils - 2.1.55, and naturally kernel itself). New kernel
runs on my home computer so there is no network in it (i didn't compiled
it even as a module).
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org .