Re: pppd & NT

[Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org>]

On Wed, Oct 29, 1997 at 03:26:26PM +1000, Mark Constable wrote:
> Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > Anyone had any problems with NT clients dialing into PPPD 2.2.0f?
> > ...
> It may be that the distribution has not been compiled with -DCHAPMS ?
> 
> ---- from README.MSCHAP in pppd 2.3.1
> In short, MS-CHAP is identified as <auth chap 80> since the hex value
> of 80 is used to designate Microsoft's scheme.  Standard PPP CHAP uses
> a value of 5.  If you enable PPP debugging with the "debug" option and
> see something like the following in your logs, the remote server is
> requesting MS-CHAP:
> 
>   rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x2 <asyncmap 0x0> <auth chap 80> <magic 0x46a3>]
>                                            ^^^^^^^^^^^^

The PPP log indicates that the login has been successful.


Oct 28 14:55:13 yodeller pppd[26189]: user ptle logged in
Oct 28 14:55:13 yodeller pppd[26189]: sent [PAP AuthAck id=0x1msg="Login ok"]
Oct 28 14:55:13 yodeller pppd[26189]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x1 <addr 203.63.216
.19> <compress VJ 0f 01>]
Oct 28 14:55:13 yodeller pppd[26189]: rcvd [CCP ConfReq id=0x4 < 12 06 00 00 00 
01>]
Oct 28 14:55:13 yodeller pppd[26189]: sent [CCP ConfReq id=0x1]
Oct 28 14:55:13 yodeller pppd[26189]: sent [CCP ConfRej id=0x4 < 12 06 00 00 00 
01>]
Oct 28 14:55:13 yodeller pppd[26189]: rcvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0x5 <compress VJ 0f 
01> <addr 0.0.0.0> < 81 06 00 00 00 00> < 82 06 00 00 00 00> < 83 06 00 00 00 00
> < 84 06 00 00 00 00>]
Oct 28 14:55:13 yodeller pppd[26189]: sent [IPCP ConfNak id=0x5 <addr 203.63.216
.18> < 81 06 cb 3f d8 13> < 82 06 cb 3f d8 13> < 83 06 cb 09 94 02>]
Oct 28 14:55:13 yodeller pppd[26189]: rcvd [IPCP ConfAck id=0x1 <addr 203.63.216
.19> <compress VJ 0f 01>]
Oct 28 14:55:14 yodeller pppd[26189]: rcvd [CCP ConfAck id=0x1 < fe 02>]
Oct 28 14:55:14 yodeller pppd[26189]: rcvd [CCP TermReq id=0x6 00 00 02 dc]
Oct 28 14:55:14 yodeller pppd[26189]: sent [CCP TermAck id=0x6]
Oct 28 14:55:14 yodeller pppd[26189]: rcvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0x7 <compress VJ 0f 
01> <addr 203.63.216.18> < 81 06 cb 3f d8 13> < 82 06 cb 3f d8 13> < 83 06 cb 09
 94 02> < 84 06 00 00 00 00>]
[etc. This repeats]

> I know you are not using CHAP and most likely just PAP but there
> could be an overlap in the code. Hopefully a 2.3.2 sometime soon
> might get a few of these things worked out properly.
> 
> All this unpaid pain us Linux users go thru... buy M$ and get on
> with life (not likely for me but I could hear someone saying this).


Thanks for your help. Linux it is and will always be.


Hamish
-- 
Hamish Moffatt, StudIEAust              hamish@debian.org, hmoffatt@mail.com
Student, computer science & computer systems engineering.    3rd year, RMIT.
http://hamish.home.ml.org/ (PGP key here)             CPOM: [*****     ] 58%
The opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth.  --Bohr


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-user-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .