Re: Cyrix kernel patch

To: Debian <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Cyrix kernel patch
From: Shaleh <shaleh@livenet.net>
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 1997 09:44:39 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 343A3CC7.44BD9410@livenet.net>
References: <[🔎] 01bcd2c5$a3491fc0$0300a8c0@adam> <[🔎] XFMail.971006200519.grep@oriole.sbay.org> <[🔎] 19971007165043.12397@yallara.cs.rmit.edu.au>

I have never had an ounce of problem with my chip.  I have a 150+ that
behaves well.  The problem I have seen is that everyone uses the wrong
clock setup.  My 150+ is actually a 120Mhz.  The other problem I have
seen is that not everyone makes motherboards that behave well with
cyrix/IBM chips.  We use several cyrix/IBM's here at work and have sold
many IBM 200+'s to customers.  No problems.  I just want my boot to say
CyrixInstead 6x86 instead of unknown 486.  set6x86 has solved my heat
concerns in my rather unventilated case.


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-user-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cyrix kernel patch
  - From: Al Youngwerth <alberty@apexxtech.com>
- Re: Cyrix kernel patch
  - From: Paul Miller <paul@3dillusion.com>

References:
- Re: Cyrix kernel patch
  - From: "Adam Heath" <adam.heath@usa.net>
- Re: Cyrix kernel patch
  - From: George Bonser <grep@oriole.sbay.org>
- Re: Cyrix kernel patch
  - From: Hamish Moffatt <hmoffatt@mail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Bo-Hamm was Re: ghostscript problem
Next by Date: Re: netscape communicator 4.03
Previous by thread: Re: Cyrix kernel patch
Next by thread: Re: Cyrix kernel patch
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread