Re: Minimizing Mail Packages?

To: Debian User Community <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Minimizing Mail Packages?
From: Adrian Bridgett <adrian.bridgett@poboxes.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 1997 19:12:03 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 19970730191203.46012@wyvern>
Reply-to: adrian.bridgett@poboxes.com
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 199707301427.KAA01979@hmm.nowhere>; from Igor Grobman on Wed, Jul 30, 1997 at 10:27:53AM -0400
References: <[🔎] 33DF192A.B43B0D11@cfw.com> <[🔎] 199707301427.KAA01979@hmm.nowhere>

On Jul 30, Igor Grobman wrote
> Now that you mention it, mutt has some POP3 support which I never tried.  I 
> assume it's quite inflexible though, so I would recommend leaving fetchmail on 
> your system.

Last time I looked, mutt recommended using fetchmail or something like
that. I think the reason is that if something went wrong, fetchmail is
less likely to lose email.

Adrian

-- 
.signature in post


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-user-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .

Reply to:

References:
- Minimizing Mail Packages?
  - From: Victor Torrico <vtorrico@cfw.com>
- Re: Minimizing Mail Packages?
  - From: Igor Grobman <igor@digicron.com>

Prev by Date: Re: block device name
Next by Date: Compressed docs and man pages in Debian packages
Previous by thread: Re: Minimizing Mail Packages?
Next by thread: Re: Minimizing Mail Packages?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread