Re: why kernel 2.0.29 in Debian 1.3.1?

["James D. Freels" <fea@fea.rrd.ornl.gov>]

I commend the Debian development team for choosing the 2.0.29 kernel 
rather than the 2.0.30 kernel in the v 1.3.1 release.  My experience 
with the 2.0.30 kernel is that it caused the latest stable release of 
the Ibcs2 emulator software (970513) to fail.  This was important to
me in order to run the vendor's (APC) software for smart-ups based on
SCO emulation.  Perhaps there are other stories of Ibcs2 or other 
2.0.30 failures the Debian users would like to share?

-- 
/------------------------------------------------------------------\
| James D. Freels, P.E._i, Ph.D.  | Phone:  (423)576-8645  |   | L |
| Oak Ridge National Laboratory   | FAX:    (423)574-9172  | H | I |
| Research Reactors Division      | Internet: fea@ornl.gov | F | N |
| P. O. Box 2008                  | Reactor Technology     | I | U |
| Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831-6392 | world's best neutrons! | R | X |
\------------------------------------------------------------------/


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-user-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .