Mail problem
Hi,
I have problems with sending mails from my linux machine. Here is a
description of the circumstances:
System: Debian Linux 1.3
Linux Kernel 2.1.29
linuxm68k
14 MB, 12 MB Swap
Mailprograms: smail as mta
mailx, elm or pine
fetchmail as popclient
Short description of mailpath:
incoming Mail: I get mail from pop.uni-mainz.de with fetchmail (using
pop3). Fetchmail delivers mail to my system via smtp,
smail distributes to the local recipients.
outgoing mail: if not online mail is stored in the mailqueue. Running a
"runq" it is delivered to goofy.zdv.uni-mainz.de when I
go online. (goofy... is configured as smarthost in
smail).
my problem: sending a mail with pine I have no problems. For a special
purpose I need a mailer usable in scripts (-> no pine).
Sending a mail with mailx or elm some (not all) mails
don't reach their recipients (but I don't get bounces or
error messages). The adresses are from aol or tu-berlin.
clue? running mailq I sense significant differences in the
queued mails:
queued mail sent from pine:
!-oem
!-f
!allad000@goofy.zdv.uni-mainz.de
!-oMs
!localhost
!-oMr
!smtp
!-oMP
!sendmail
!<pbembase@geocities.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Jun 1997 10:08:01 +0200 (CEST)
From: Dirk Allard <allad000@goofy.zdv.uni-mainz.de>
X-Sender: allad000@united
Reply-To: Dirk Allard <allad000@goofy.zdv.uni-mainz.de>
To: pbembase@geocities.com
Subject: Re: Atlantis Report anscheinend nicht angekommen
In-Reply-To: <33986B5B.2B71@geocities.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.970607100421.429A-300000@united>
queued mail sent with mailx
!allad000
!1000 100
!-oem
!-oMP
!send-mail
!son01087@wipux2.wifo.uni-mannheim.de
To: son01087@wipux2.wifo.uni-mannheim.de
Subject: test
-------------
Anybody who can help me? How can I configure my system to make mailx fully
work?
Dirk
---
Dirk Allard (allad000@goofy.zdv.uni-mainz.de)
GM of United 2 and 3 (Soccer-PBEM)
GM of Atlantis (Conquest )
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-user-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: