Re: A Qt alternative for KDE?
On Wed, 2 Apr 1997, Bruce Perens wrote:
> Someone suggested that if we cloned Qt, we should do it using the Lesstif
> widget set rather than the one that Qt is presently using, and this might
> be an improvement on the present Qt.
I've tested parts of KDE and it looks a lot better than any Motif product
I've ever seen. (this from someone who has been a huge fan of the Motif
interface for a long time) It's a lot better looking than say.. the CDE.
> There is GnuSTEP, too. If there wasn't, I think we'd have more interest in
> a really-free Qt.
I expect a 1.0 release of GNUstep to take about the same amount of time to
appear as the Hurd takes to reach 1.0.
I really don't think people are looking for a whole new language and such.
A consistent user interface is what they're really interesteed in. :)