Re: Unstable vs. Stable

To: Rick Macdonald <rickm@vsl.com>
Cc: Guy Maor <maor@ece.utexas.edu>, debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Unstable vs. Stable
From: David Engel <david@sw.ods.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 1997 09:01:48 -0600
Message-id: <[🔎] 19970221090148.48720@sw.ods.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.SOL.3.94.970220200049.3360C-100000@prg4>; from Rick Macdonald on Feb 02, 1997 at 08:01:29PM -0700
References: <[🔎] 8720abj9zp.fsf@slip-85-4.ots.utexas.edu> <[🔎] Pine.SOL.3.94.970220200049.3360C-100000@prg4>

On Feb 20, Rick Macdonald wrote
> I live off unstable all the time, and seem to have less problems
> than the average bear!

Be forewarned, after the release of Debian 1.3.x, we will be switching
to glibc 2.x, aka Linux libc 6.  When that happens, the unstable tree
will definitely live up to it's name, at least for a while.

David
-- 
David Engel                        ODS Networks
david@sw.ods.com                   1001 E. Arapaho Road
(972) 234-6400                     Richardson, TX  75081


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Unstable vs. Stable
  - From: Guy Maor <maor@ece.utexas.edu>
- Re: Unstable vs. Stable
  - From: Rick Macdonald <rickm@vsl.com>

Prev by Date: dselect problems
Next by Date: Re: Q: ldso_1.8.10-1_i386.deb
Previous by thread: Re: Unstable vs. Stable
Next by thread: Re: Unstable vs. Stable
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread