Re: Backspace, Delete with less in xterm
Dirk Luetjens <dirk@Elfe.lfm.RWTH-Aachen.DE> writes:
> Hello
>
> less does not do backspace and delete correct, when having the
> variable TERM=xterm set.
>
> While using the search command backspace sends delete and delete sends
> ESC[3~. With TERM=linux it's ok.
> Backspace and delete are doing the right thing in the command line.
>
>
> BTW: Does somebody know how to get Backspace and delete work right in
> ftp, lpc, ...
>
>
> Dirk
>
> P.S. I'm using the fresh Debian 1.2.2 distrib
In the beginning of my ".xsession", I do a:
xmodmap -quiet $HOME/.xmodmaprc
Here is my ".xmodmaprc":
keysym BackSpace = Delete
After adding this, my backspace and delete work everywhere... YMMV :-)
Later,
Dale
--
+-------------------- finger for pgp public key ---------------------+
| Dale E. Martin | University of Cincinnati Savant Research Laboratory |
| dmartin@ececs.uc.edu | http://www.ececs.uc.edu/~dmartin |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com
>From miss
Received: from mongo.pixar.com (138.72.50.60)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 15 Jan 1997 14:12:13 -0000
Received: (qmail 29518 invoked from network); 15 Jan 1997 14:01:36 -0000
Received: from primer.i-connect.net (HELO master.debian.org) (bruce@206.190.143.13)
by mongo.pixar.com with SMTP; 15 Jan 1997 14:01:36 -0000
Message-Id: <97Jan15.085135est.19585@sctorfw001.sprint-canada.com>
Date:Wed, 15 Jan 1997 09:03:15 -0500
From: Ami Ganguli <ami@ganguli.com>
Reply-To: ami@ganguli.com
Organization: Ganguli Consulting Inc.
X-Sender: Ami Ganguli <ami@ganguli.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.0b1 (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Nathan L. Cutler" <ncutler@terminal.cz>
CC: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Best Debian CD?
X-Priority: Normal
References: <[🔎] 199701141805.TAA06561@goober.baffle.cz>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Resent-Message-ID: <"lwmlb3.0.tE6.fEEto"@master.debian.org>
Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Resent-Reply-To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
X-Mailing-List: <debian-user@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/3556
X-Loop: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Precedence: list
Priority: non-urgent
Importance: low
Resent-Sender: debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
Nathan L. Cutler wrote:
>
> >>>>> "Richard" == Richard G Roberto <richr@Bear.COM> writes:
>
> Richard> This is a good question. I'm looking for a 1.2.x cd as
> Richard> well, but I need it to look decent.
> [...]
> Nothing against Richard personally, but I find this message
> disturbing. Never judge a book by its cover, as the saying goes.
> This applies doubly to Linux! Aren't we attracted to it so much for
> the very reason that it is the very antithesis of over-commercialized
> products that look very appealing but don't work properly?
> [...]
I agree that it's silly to worry about what the packaging looks like,
but I completely understand Richard's position.
A lot of people (like me) are using Linux to do real work in an environment
where the managers still think AS/400s are the greatest thing since the
Univac. They have an unconcealed disdain for anything that isn't made by
IBM or costs less than a million dollars. Convincing them that Linux would
be the ideal network firewall is a real sales job, and nice "commercial"
looking packaging helps.
Regards...
... Ami.
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com
Reply to: