Re: virtual mail domains... long-winded response
On Thu, 19 Dec 1996, Carl Greco wrote:
> I have set up a couple of Linux based e-mail servers with uucp. The
> main advantages of uucp are low cost and local control of e-mail
> accounts.
Exactly the reason why I like it.
> The latest system (a 386SX-16MHz 4MB PC) uses Debian 1.1
> with smail and qpopper (pop3) to distribute e-mail to a LAN comprised
> of WfWg PC's running Eudora Light clients. The major disadvantage is
> the addressing currently required, i.e.,
> local-host!username@isp-domain.net
> instead of
> username@local-host.isp-domain.net
> I suspect that the proper MX record at the ISP would fix this.
I don't use smail, so I can't comment there, but with sendmail you can
choose the type of uucp addressing to use. I use Taylor's uucp which
is smart enough to understand domain based addressing so on my mail
machine I specify the uucp-dom mailer and my Internet provider does the
same.
Hope this helps.
Best regards,
Nick
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nick Busigin <Sent from my Debian/GNU Linux Machine> nick@xwing.org
To obtain my pgp public key, email me with the subject: "get pgp-key"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com
Reply to: