Re: Is this acceptable?

To: trismcc@nh.ultranet.com (Tristan McCann)
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Is this acceptable?
From: david@elo.ods.com (David Engel)
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 1996 10:19:22 -0600 (CST)
Message-id: <[🔎] m0vHuPK-00016gC@elo.sw.ods.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] XFMail.961025155854.trismcc@nh.ultranet.com> from "Tristan McCann" at Oct 25, 96 03:55:02 pm

Tristan McCann writes:
> I was just wondering if this was acceptable:
> 
> binaries created with Libc5.4.7 are not compatable with libc5.2.18
> 
> I was wondering if it was acceptable if I make debian packages to put in the re=
> quires box
> that it requires libc5.4.7 in the unstable section.

This is OK as long as the packages you are building also go in the
unstable tree.

David
-- 
David Engel                        Optical Data Systems, Inc.
david@ods.com                      1001 E. Arapaho Road
(972) 234-6400                     Richardson, TX  75081

--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com

Reply to:

References:
- Is this acceptable?
  - From: Tristan McCann <trismcc@nh.ultranet.com>

Prev by Date: Other problems with libc5.4.7
Next by Date: Re: Problems building Python 1.4
Previous by thread: Re: Is this acceptable?
Next by thread: Problems building Python 1.4
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread