Re: Intel EtherExpress Pro 100B
I have had no problems with Donald Beckers [sp.] eepro100.c driver built against the 2.0.18 sources. As well, I have also used a couple of different Tulip based cards; the Cogent EM960 (which, btw, causes the system to lock up under heavy load) and the SMC 21041 based card.
If you would like, I have the kernel module built for a 2.0.18 kernel that doesn't have the symbols version stamped; I'd be happy to mail you a copy.
b.bum
Begin forwarded message:
>From agent Sat Oct 26 01: 10:59 1996
Resent-Date: Sat, 26 Oct 1996 01:10:54 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 1996 20:37:32 -0500 (CDT)
From: "Neal R. Dalton" <nrd@XOX.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Intel EtherExpress Pro 100B
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Resent-Reply-To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
X-Mailing-List: <debian-user@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/1014
X-Loop: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Priority: non-urgent
Importance: low
Resent-Sender: debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
Has any installed a Intel EtherExpress Pro 100B on a 2.x kernel? I
installed Debian 1.1 and tried to get eepro100.c working.
How about other 100Mb cards?
Thanks,
Neal
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com
Reply to: