[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: 386 Dx-40




On Tue, 24 Sep 1996 C.J.Lawson@cranfield.ac.uk wrote:

> 	A Q. Q. is anyone out there using still using a 386 dx-40 (running
> Linux) and if so could you let us know what problems you are having if any
> I am considering the purchase of one..

     It runs fine. Of course, depending on the amount of memory, 
speed/size of the disk, presence or absense of memory cache, etc, 
performance may vary widely. Some time ago (with slackware and kernel 
1.2.8), a 386DX40Mhz with 4Mb of ram and 64K cache memory compiled the 
kernel in about 4 hours. More memory means a *big* difference here. I 
even used netscape on this machine (X + static netscape), but it used to 
take a long time for it to startup (again, the main point is memory). The 
speed of the disk is also important; some older disks are *much* slower 
than others.

     Other than that, it's just as stable as linux ever was, i.e., very 
(I *never* experienced a lockup).

See ya,
Nelson
lago@that.com.br



Reply to: