Re: slack2deb script and controversy

To: rdm@tad.micro.umn.edu, miquels@cistron.nl
Cc: purcell@rmcs.cranfield.ac.uk, kaszeta@me.umn.edu, debian-user@Pixar.com
Subject: Re: slack2deb script and controversy
From: david@elo.ods.com (David Engel)
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 22:07:49 -0600 (CST)
Message-id: <[🔎] m0tqBGv-000BkAC@elo.ods.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] m0tq6lE-0006iQC@rdm.legislate.com> from "Raul Miller" at Feb 23, 96 06:18:00 pm

> INN was dropped because it was fairly unusable.  It's not been
> re-instated because those with the time to work on INN have not been
> able to get news feeds to test it against.

I believe Miquel van Smoorenburg promised to package INN.  Right,
Miquel?  If so, how is it going?  I'm interested because we will soon
be moving our news from a Sparc IPX to a Pentium system running Linux.

David
-- 
David Engel                        Optical Data Systems, Inc.
david@ods.com                      1101 E. Arapaho Road
(214) 234-6400                     Richardson, TX  75081

Reply to:

References:
- Re: slack2deb script and controversy
  - From: Raul Miller <rdm@tad.micro.umn.edu>

Prev by Date: help adding machine to network
Next by Date: Re: slack2deb script and controversy
Previous by thread: Re: slack2deb script and controversy
Next by thread: Re: slack2deb script and controversy
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread