[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: psfonts and MakeTeXPK



On Wed, 8 Nov 1995, Mr A Birdi wrote:

> 
> Dear Debian user,
> 
> While most of my move to Debian from mcc-interim has gone remarkably
> smoothly, I would note a few oddments about the TeX related packages.
> 
> 1) Some of the packages (dvips, I think), seem to require something
> called `psfonts', a package which I cannot trace on any Debian
> site. This means that the psfonts.map file in /usr/lib/texmf/dvips is
> not configured correctly because it relies on this package.
The correct name is texpsfnt and it is not required but recommended.
The package should configure correctly. Are you sure you have a current 
version (revision 3) of dvips?

> 2) There appears to be no `gsftopk' program in any of the TeX/ps
> packages. Since this is a must for using xdvik with postscript fonts,
> it seems to be a serious omission.
There is ps2pk. The only difference is that it will not need ghostscript 
but can only render type1 fonts. Since the only fonts it cannot render 
are the ghostscript-supplied .gsf fonts the omission imho is not that
grave. ps2pk is smaller and faster that gsftopk and ghostscript and a 
while ago only ps2pk but not ghostscript did use the hints in type1 fonts.

But because of user demand and as small systems become less important, 
I'll probably make a gsftopk version in the future.

> 3) The file /usr/lib/texmf/dvips/render.ps was missing (I think it
> belongs in the dvips package). This is necessary for gsftopk to work.
Will come with gsftopk
> 
> 4) The line `$cmd' in /usr/bin/MakeTeXPK should read `$cmd 1>&2' or
> else xdvik thinks that an automatically generated font has not been
> created when it has!
True. Corrected and to be uploaded soon.

Nils


Reply to: