[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: diald anyone?



"DE" == Dirk Eddelbuettel <Dirk.Eddelbuettel@qed.econ.queensu.ca> writes:

  DE> Bill Hogan writes:
  Bill> "DE" == Dirk Eddelbuettel <Dirk.Eddelbuettel@qed.econ.queensu.ca>
  Bill> writes:
  DE> ... A lot of doc is in /debian/project/standards.  There is for
  Bill> example the `hello' package.  Grab the hello-1.3.4.deb and
  Bill> hello-1.3.4.tar.gz.  Unpack the .tar.gz and look at the control
  Bill> files.  Read the doc from /debian/project/standards. ...
  Bill> I have these files but I do not see how `patch' is supposed to be
  Bill> applied to these two files to restore the status quo ante.

  DE> You might be right. There was some discussion recently whether a
  DE> 'un-debianisation' of the sources is/should be/will be
provided. 

  DE> It is not required. Some people do, some don't (I don't as I
  DE> copied my debian.rules from hello).

  DE> debian.rules for hello doesn't have a target for reverse patching.

  DE> I also forgot to tell you that you need the original hello
  DE> package from the GNU site prep.ai.mit.edu or one of its mirrors in
  DE> order to create the diff file for Debian.

  DE> Hope this helps,

  DE> -- 
  DE> Dirk.Eddelbuettel@qed.econ.queensu.ca


    Thank you.

    But I have the impression that to each file

	debian-package.deb

available to Debian users, there corresponds both

	debian-package-src.tar.gz
and
	debian-package.diff.gz

    What is the reason for these `.diff.gz' files?


    Bill


Reply to: