Re: aptitude upgrade vs. apt-get upgrade
Saludos y disculpen el TP, solo uso el celular para la lista.
Gracias Juan por la aclaratoria.
Ya me estaba preocupando.
José Gregorio.
In english:
Hi juan and sorry about TP, I only reaf the mail list from my cell phone.
Thanks Juan for clarify.
I was starting to worry about it.
José Gregorio.
Enviado desde mi dispositivo movil BlackBerry® de Digitel.
-----Original Message-----
From: Juan Lavieri <jlavieri@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2011 21:42:41
To: <debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: aptitude upgrade vs. apt-get upgrade
Hola.
Por favor disculpen el top-posting pero el resto está en inglés.
José Gregorio, Kete ya te indicó lo que dice en las FAQ y si seguimos el
hilo en la lista debian-security notaremos que lo que llevó a esta duda
fue un asunto relacionado con repositorios incompletos, de todos modos
creo que ya se aclaró el punto así que prevalece lo que dice en las
FAQ's y en las release notes desde hace algún tiempo a saber: "aptitude
is the preferred program for daily package management from console." O
sea, oficialmente aptitude seguirá siendo promovido por los
desarrolladores como el manejador de paquetes preferido desde consola.
Saludos.
Juan Lavieri
El 02/04/11 21:04, José Gregorio Díaz Unda escribió:
> Hi Kete and thanks in advance for clarification.
>
> So its not true "apt-get" is not recommended for "squeeze" machines?
>
> Thanks again.
>
> Joseph.
>
> Enviado desde mi dispositivo movil BlackBerry® de Digitel.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From: * Kete <kwfj@suddenlink.net>
> *Date: *Sat, 2 Apr 2011 21:31:59 -0400
> *To: *<xt4mhz@yahoo.com>
> *Subject: *Re: aptitude upgrade vs. apt-get upgrade
>
> Hi José,
>
> You can find a reference at
> http://www.debian.org/doc/FAQ/ch-pkgtools.en.html#s-aptitude "aptitude
> is the preferred program for daily package management from console."
> This FAQ is also available as the package debian-faq which installs in
> /usr/share/doc like lots of other helpful documentation.
>
> Regards,
>
> Kete
>
> On Saturday April 2, 2011 8:24:24 pm José Gregorio Díaz Unda wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone.
>
> >
>
> > Why is that?
>
> >
>
> > Where can we find source info about this recomendation?
>
> >
>
> > Joseph.
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Enviado desde mi dispositivo movil BlackBerry® de Digitel.
>
> >
>
> > -----Original Message-----
>
> > From: Riku Valli <riku.valli@vallit.fi>
>
> > Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:12:19
>
> > To: <debian-security@lists.debian.org>
>
> > Subject: Re: aptitude upgrade vs. apt-get upgrade
>
> >
>
> > On 03/31/2011 04:23 PM, Benedikt Hallinger wrote:
>
> > > Hi,
>
> > > i noticed that too and switched back to apt-get for that reason.
>
> >
>
> > Hi
>
> >
>
> > apt-get is now preferred method over aptitude at Squeeze. However at
>
> > Lenny aptitude is preferred over apt-get.
>
> >
>
> > You should use apt-get with Squeeze and aptitude with Lenny.
>
> >
>
> > Regards, Riku
>
> >
>
> > > On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 14:49:19 +0200, Thomas Hungenberg
>
> > >
>
> > > <th+lists-debian@demonium.de> wrote:
>
> > >> Hi,
>
> > >>
>
> > >> since upgrading from lenny to squeeze, I've noticed several times
> that
>
> > >> aptitude
>
> > >> does not install all available security updates whereas apt-get does.
>
> > >>
>
> > >> Currently, this looks like:
>
> > >>
>
> > >> # aptitude -s upgrade
>
> > >>
>
> > >> The following packages will be upgraded:
>
> > >> bind9-host dnsutils libbind9-60 libdns69 libisc62 libisccc60
>
> > >>
>
> > >> libisccfg62 liblwres60
>
> > >> 8 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not
> upgraded.
>
> > >>
>
> > >> # apt-get -s upgrade
>
> > >> Reading package lists... Done
>
> > >> Building dependency tree
>
> > >> Reading state information... Done
>
> > >>
>
> > >> The following packages will be upgraded:
>
> > >> bind9-host dnsutils libbind9-60 libdns69 libisc62 libisccc60
>
> > >>
>
> > >> libisccfg62 liblwres60
>
> > >> tex-common
>
> > >> 9 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
>
> > >>
>
> > >> What's the reason for this?
>
> > >>
>
> > >> - Thomas
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-spanish-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: [🔎] 4D97D799.6000002@gmail.com">http://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 4D97D799.6000002@gmail.com
Reply to: