[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [OT] Iperf y rendimiento optimo de red



> Una prueba de 10 conexiones en paralelo con 15 Mbytes de datos (iperf -c 
> iphostsid -P 10 -n 15M, la suma me da también 12Mbits/sg) 
> 
> Es decir, tengo un 12% de rendimiento práctico frente al teórico más o menos y 
> creo que hay algo que limita mi ancho de banda a 12Mbits/sg.
> 

No es por jorobar pero acabo de hacer la prueba (no conocia iperf) y a 
mi de esto (parece que tines algo mal) estan los dos estremos conectado 
1 100 full ?

------------------------------------------------------------
Client connecting to ainara, TCP port 5001
TCP window size: 16.0 KByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
[ 12] local 192.168.15.2 port 58210 connected with 192.168.15.3 port 
5001
[  3] local 192.168.15.2 port 58201 connected with 192.168.15.3 port 
5001
[  4] local 192.168.15.2 port 58202 connected with 192.168.15.3 port 
5001
[  5] local 192.168.15.2 port 58203 connected with 192.168.15.3 port 
5001
[  6] local 192.168.15.2 port 58204 connected with 192.168.15.3 port 
5001
[  7] local 192.168.15.2 port 58205 connected with 192.168.15.3 port 
5001
[  8] local 192.168.15.2 port 58206 connected with 192.168.15.3 port 
5001
[  9] local 192.168.15.2 port 58207 connected with 192.168.15.3 port 
5001
[ 10] local 192.168.15.2 port 58208 connected with 192.168.15.3 port 
5001
[ 11] local 192.168.15.2 port 58209 connected with 192.168.15.3 port 
5001
[  4]  0.0-13.1 sec  15.0 MBytes  9.60 Mbits/sec
[  5]  0.0-13.1 sec  15.0 MBytes  9.58 Mbits/sec
[  6]  0.0-13.1 sec  15.0 MBytes  9.57 Mbits/sec
[  7]  0.0-13.2 sec  15.0 MBytes  9.57 Mbits/sec
[  3]  0.0-13.2 sec  15.0 MBytes  9.56 Mbits/sec
[ 11]  0.0-13.2 sec  15.0 MBytes  9.53 Mbits/sec
[  8]  0.0-13.3 sec  15.0 MBytes  9.48 Mbits/sec
[  9]  0.0-13.3 sec  15.0 MBytes  9.47 Mbits/sec
[ 10]  0.0-13.3 sec  15.0 MBytes  9.46 Mbits/sec
[ 12]  0.0-13.3 sec  15.0 MBytes  9.45 Mbits/sec
[SUM]  0.0-13.3 sec    150 MBytes  94.5 Mbits/sec



Reply to: