Re: HelixGnome

[Javier Viñuales Gutiérrez <vigu@ctv.es>]

On jue, oct 19, 2000 at 05:42:49 +0200, Javier Viñuales Gutiérrez wrote:
> A fecha de hoy, puedes hacer tranquilo un 'apt-get update; apt-get upgrade'
> con spidermonkey en tu sources.list :)

Acaba de corroborármelo el responsable de los paquetes debian de Helix
GNOME Peter Teichman.

----- Forwarded message from Peter Teichman <peter@helixcode.com> -----

Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 11:52:26 -0400
To: Javier Vi?uales Guti?rrez <vigu@ctv.es>
Subject: Re: stable vs unstable Debian packages
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <20001019175103.A698@ctv>; from vigu@ctv.es on Thu, Oct 19,
2000 at 05:51:03PM +0200
From: Peter Teichman <peter@helixcode.com>
X-UIDL: 38f1cfff2c5657c832484c8e40834471

On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 05:51:03PM +0200, Javier Vi?uales Guti?rrez wrote:
> On mar, sep 26, 2000 at 09:37:23 -0400, Peter Teichman wrote:
> > I'm working on changing that now. Our current setup has been fine so
> > far, but definitely needs to be changed soon. The scheme you suggest
> > is exactly what I am working toward.
>
> Hi Peter, since this email from you I'v been waiting for changing the
> structure of gonme helixcode debian packages tree: "stable" and "unstable".
>
> Are you working on it, there are many debian user that ask me about this and
> I don't know the answer of this quiestion: is it dangerous to use
> 'apt-get upgrade' on Potato with "unstable" from glibc upgrade to 2.2
> point of view?.

It has always been safe to upgrade the Helix GNOME packages. I'm
building them all on Potato at the moment.

Peter

----- End forwarded message -----

-- 
Javier Viñuales Gutiérrez <vigu@ctv.es>
Webs: 	http://www.ctv.es/USERS/vigu		Personal
PGP public key:  http://www.ctv.es/USERS/vigu/vigu.pubkey