[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: smartctl Ausgabe prefailing/Failing now

alexander bachmer <alex.bachmer@t-online.de> wrote:

> Bruce Allen said on smartmontools-support list
> <https://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=Pine.LNX.4.63.0708310141280.17169%40trinity.phys.uwm.edu>
> (2007-08-31): /The raw values for certain Attributes have
> vendor-specific meanings and are hard to interpret unless you know
> exactly how the vendor uses them on that specific disk model. The bit
> pattern might be a mix of flags, counters, and bitmasks, for example,
> leading to large and strange numbers. I wouldn't worry about the raw
> values very much. The normalized values (VALUE/WORST/THRESH) should
> have a sensible interpretation./

Exakt das habe ich ja auch gesagt.


Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.

Reply to: