Hello Christian,
Christian Perrier hat am Wed 25. Feb, 09:00 (+0100) geschrieben:
> Quoting Christian Knoke (chrisk@cknoke.de):
> > Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org> schrieb am 24. Feb um 21:44 Uhr:
> > > Quoting Jörg Sommer (joerg@alea.gnuu.de):
> > >
> > > > > What makes you think it should produce a (non-dead) acute?
> > > >
> > > > Because it's printed on the key. On my keyboard the dash goes from lower
> > >
> > > Aha. *that* is the best argument I've ever heard as of now..:-)
> > >
> > > I think that Jörg's suggestion made it but I really wonder why the
> > > same key in X doesn't produce an acute in such case.....
> >
> > I've found this link:
> >
> > http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/ucs/apostrophe.html
>
>
> OK. Again an argument for the key to issue an acute.
>
> I suggest we settle for a *dead* acute, though, in the de.kmap
> files.....just like the de-latin1 keymap....while the
> de-latin1-nodeadkeys.kmap will have the "non dead" versions, ie
> "apostrophe" and "grave
> de-latin1-nodeadkeys.kmap:
> keycode 13 = apostrophe grave
Why not acute? The apostrophe is already on the key right of ä. There
might be programs combining ´a to á. I've checked the compose sequences
and they all use the apostrophe and do not support the acut. Maybe, this
could be changed, too?
Bye, Jörg.
--
Wer eher stirbt ist länger tot.
(Un B. Kant)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenPGP