Quoting Christian Knoke (chrisk@cknoke.de): > Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org> schrieb am 24. Feb um 21:44 Uhr: > > Quoting Jörg Sommer (joerg@alea.gnuu.de): > > > > > > What makes you think it should produce a (non-dead) acute? > > > > > > Because it's printed on the key. On my keyboard the dash goes from lower > > > > Aha. *that* is the best argument I've ever heard as of now..:-) > > > > I think that Jörg's suggestion made it but I really wonder why the > > same key in X doesn't produce an acute in such case..... > > I've found this link: > > http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/ucs/apostrophe.html OK. Again an argument for the key to issue an acute. I suggest we settle for a *dead* acute, though, in the de.kmap files.....just like the de-latin1 keymap....while the de-latin1-nodeadkeys.kmap will have the "non dead" versions, ie "apostrophe" and "grave (just like the "nondeadkeys" version of the X keymap. de.kmap: keycode 13 = dead_acute dead_grave de-latin1.kmap: keycode 13 = dead_acute dead_grave de-latin1-nodeadkeys.kmap: keycode 13 = apostrophe grave Any objections?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature