Re: procmail problem

To: debian-user-german <debian-user-german@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: procmail problem
From: "Erik Hahn" <ng.ehahn@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:54:30 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] op.t41f841cj7co9v@eriks>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20080116192543.GE3984@workaround.org>
References: <[🔎] 1127710823.20080116143721@listmails.de> <[🔎] 20080116135349.GJ3873@laptux.ov.otto.de> <[🔎] 20080116192002.GA2211@eumel.yoo.local> <[🔎] 20080116192543.GE3984@workaround.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Am 16.01.2008, 20:25 Uhr, schrieb Christoph Haas <haas@debian.org>:

Procmail ist
schon das absolute Standard-Tool, wenn man mehr mit Emails macht als
meine Schwiegermutter. (Die benutzt kmail.)

Was war noch mal das verbreitetste, also Standard-OS?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) - WinPT 1.2.0

iD8DBQFHjmC/oAxx2xPq9I8RApQpAJ0ZWey66JLL+7PI/YSqG7849fr4TQCeIHRZ
yMmoT/wqzZqeX9+XV86p7Ec=
=i2zL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply to:

References:
- procmail problem
  - From: Daniel <daniel@listmails.de>
- Re: procmail problem
  - From: Christoph Haas <haas@debian.org>
- Re: procmail problem
  - From: Thorsten Haude <debian@thorstenhau.de>
- Re: procmail problem
  - From: Christoph Haas <haas@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: procmail problem
Next by Date: Re: procmail problem
Previous by thread: Re: procmail problem
Next by thread: Re: procmail problem
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread