Re: sources.list Eintrag
> Sacht mal, hat experimental schon den namen Scud bekommen? War ja in
> Diskussion.
dazu folgende diskussion <at> debian-devel<at>lists<dot>debian<dot>org:
Message-id: <20031215104647.GA22147@giraffe.nosignal.org>
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 02:46:27AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Christoph Berg wrote:
> > since we are discussing codenames for the Debian/*BSD OSs, I noticed
> > that the "experimental" distribution doesn't have a codename yet, as
> > unstable has with "Sid". I'd propose to call it "Scud", which is the
> > Name of Sid's dog (which broke toys even worse than Sid did ;-).
>
> I think that although "Scud" looks nice in this context giving a
> codename to experimental is not something we have to do since
> experimental is not a full distribution -- it only contains packages and
> makes only sense with a "normal, codenamed" distro (sid) installed....
>
Marius
--
Linux is like a wigwam: No Gates, no Windows, but Apache inside! :-)
--
UN*X S*X
{look;find;talk;grep;touch;finger;find;flex;unzip;mount;workbone;
fsck;yes;gasp;fsck;yes;eject;umount;makeclean;zip;split;done;exit}
--
Reply to: