Re: stable, testing, unstable?
Heino Tiedemann <rotkap@rotkap.de> wrote:
> um 100% sicher zu sein, das ich das alles Verstanden habe:
> Die Versionen bei debian sind so aufgereiht, oder:
> (von stabil nach unstabil)
> - Stable
> - Frozen
> - Testing
> - Unstable
> Oder?
> Oder kommt Testing, Frozen noch hinter Unstable?
> wie ist die Reihenfolge richtig?
http://www.dcoul.de/infos/debian.html
|Die Debian-Distribution gibt es in drei Ausführungen: "stable",
|"testing" und "unstable". Während die stable-Distribution ausgiebig
|getestet und bereit für den Produktionseinsatz ist, wird in testing
|die nächste Release vorbereitet - die eigentliche Entwicklung
|hingegen findet in unstable statt.
frozen als eigene Distribution gibt es nicht mehr, vor dem Release
wird testing teilweise eingefroren.
|---Developer's Reference 4.6.4.1-------------
|After a period of development, once the release manager deems fit,
|the testing distribution is frozen, meaning that the policies
|which control how packages move from unstable to testing are
|tightened. Packages which are too buggy are removed. No changes
|are allowed into testing except for bug fixes. After some time
|has elapsed, depending on progress, the testing distribution goes
|into a `deep freeze', when no changes are made to it except those
|needed for the installation system. This is called a "test cycle",
|and it can last up to two weeks. There can be several test cycles,
|until the distribution is prepared for release, as decided by the
|release manager. At the end of the last test cycle, the testing
|distribution is renamed to stable, overriding the old stable
|distribution, which is removed at that time (although it can be
|found at archive.debian.org).
cu andreas
Reply to: