Re: Bug in xterm?

To: debian-user-german@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug in xterm?
From: Matthias Fechner <idefix@fechner.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 10:39:07 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20030130093906.GA53754@server.idefix.loc>
Mail-followup-to: debian-user-german@lists.debian.org
Reply-to: debian-user-german@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 200301291930.30983@141.99.26.129>
References: <[🔎] 20030127132831.GA8065@server.idefix.loc> <[🔎] 20030127174019.GD16187@yun.yagibdah.de> <[🔎] 20030129115803.GC91595@server.idefix.loc> <[🔎] 200301291930.30983@141.99.26.129>

Hallo Alexander und Matthias,

* Alexander Glasmacher <alexander.glasmacher@gmx.de> [29-01-03 19:33]:
> XTerm.VT100*geometry: 90x70

Super, danke das wars.

-- 
Gruss
Matthias

Reply to:

References:
- Bug in xterm?
  - From: Matthias Fechner <idefix@fechner.net>
- Re: Bug in xterm?
  - From: Hans Wilmer <lee@yun.yagibdah.de>
- Re: Bug in xterm?
  - From: Matthias Fechner <idefix@fechner.net>
- Re: Bug in xterm?
  - From: Alexander Glasmacher <alexander.glasmacher@gmx.de>

Prev by Date: Re: proble
Next by Date: Re: glibc
Previous by thread: Re: Bug in xterm?
Next by thread: Digital Kamera, Antwort von Pentax :-), Lösung für Pentax User
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread