[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Squeeze] Au secours ! Ma machine ne démarre plus correctement !



Ok, j'ai démonté /mnt/sdc1, puis j'ai fait reiserfsck /dev/sdc1 :

###########
reiserfsck --check started at Tue Feb  8 14:11:27 2011
###########
Replaying journal..
Reiserfs journal '/dev/sdc1' in blocks [18..8211]: 0 transactions replayed
Checking internal tree../  1 (of   2)/ 19 (of  94)/ 27 (of
153)bad_stat_data: The objectid (877723) is marked free, but used by
an object [208 877723 0x0 SD (0)]
/ 38 (of 153)bad_stat_data: The objectid (877724) is marked free, but
used by an object [208 877724 0x0 SD (0)]
/ 36 (of  94)/131 (of 156)bad_stat_data: The objectid (705238) is
marked free, but used by an object [1826 705238 0x0 SD (0)]
bad_stat_data: The objectid (819611) is marked free, but used by an
object [1826 819611 0x0 SD (0)]
bad_stat_data: The objectid (821058) is marked free, but used by an
object [1826 821058 0x0 SD (0)]
bad_stat_data: The objectid (845038) is marked free, but used by an
object [1826 845038 0x0 SD (0)]
/ 37 (of  94)/112 (of 159)bad_stat_data: The objectid (630282) is
marked free, but used by an object [1834 630282 0x0 SD (0)]
/  2 (of   2)/112 (of 112)/ 40 (of 110)bad_stat_data: The objectid
(1396119) is marked free, but used by an object [1396105 1396119 0x0
SD (0)]
/ 41 (of 110)bad_stat_data: The objectid (1396124) is marked free, but
used by an object [1396105 1396124 0x0 SD (0)]
bad_stat_data: The objectid (1396125) is marked free, but used by an
object [1396105 1396125 0x0 SD (0)]
/ 42 (of 110)bad_stat_data: The objectid (1396126) is marked free, but
used by an object [1396105 1396126 0x0 SD (0)]
/ 48 (of 110)bad_stat_data: The objectid (1396425) is marked free, but
used by an object [1396105 1396425 0x0 SD (0)]
/ 50 (of 110)bad_stat_data: The objectid (1396435) is marked free, but
used by an object [1396105 1396435 0x0 SD (0)]
/ 58 (of 110)bad_stat_data: The objectid (1396426) is marked free, but
used by an object [1396425 1396426 0x0 SD (0)]
bad_stat_data: The objectid (1396427) is marked free, but used by an
object [1396426 1396427 0x0 SD (0)]
/ 59 (of 110)bad_stat_data: The objectid (1396443) is marked free, but
used by an object [1396442 1396443 0x0 SD (0)]
bad_stat_data: The objectid (1396445) is marked free, but used by an
object [1396442 1396445 0x0 SD (0)]
bad_stat_data: The objectid (1396447) is marked free, but used by an
object [1396442 1396447 0x0 SD (0)]
bad_stat_data: The objectid (1396448) is marked free, but used by an
object [1396442 1396448 0x0 SD (0)]
bad_stat_data: The objectid (1396449) is marked free, but used by an
object [1396442 1396449 0x0 SD (0)]
/ 60 (of 110)bad_stat_data: The objectid (1396451) is marked free, but
used by an object [1396442 1396451 0x0 SD (0)]
bad_stat_data: The objectid (1396452) is marked free, but used by an
object [1396442 1396452 0x0 SD (0)]
bad_stat_data: The objectid (1396453) is marked free, but used by an
object [1396442 1396453 0x0 SD (0)]
bad_stat_data: The objectid (1396454) is marked free, but used by an
object [1396442 1396454 0x0 SD (0)]
bad_stat_data: The objectid (1396456) is marked free, but used by an
object [1396442 1396456 0x0 SD (0)]
bad_stat_data: The objectid (1396457) is marked free, but used by an
object [1396442 1396457 0x0 SD (0)]
bad_stat_data: The objectid (1396458) is marked free, but used by an
object [1396442 1396458 0x0 SD (0)]
bad_stat_data: The objectid (1396459) is marked free, but used by an
object [1396442 1396459 0x0 SD (0)]
bad_stat_data: The objectid (1396460) is marked free, but used by an
object [1396442 1396460 0x0 SD (0)]
bad_stat_data: The objectid (1396461) is marked free, but used by an
object [1396442 1396461 0x0 SD (0)]
bad_stat_data: The objectid (1396462) is marked free, but used by an
object [1396442 1396462 0x0 SD (0)]
bad_stat_data: The objectid (1396464) is marked free, but used by an
object [1396442 1396464 0x0 SD (0)]
/ 61 (of 110)bad_stat_data: The objectid (1396466) is marked free, but
used by an object [1396442 1396466 0x0 SD (0)]
bad_stat_data: The objectid (1396468) is marked free, but used by an
object [1396442 1396468 0x0 SD (0)]
bad_stat_data: The objectid (1396469) is marked free, but used by an
object [1396442 1396469 0x0 SD (0)]
bad_stat_data: The objectid (1396470) is marked free, but used by an
object [1396442 1396470 0x0 SD (0)]
bad_stat_data: The objectid (1396471) is marked free, but used by an
object [1396442 1396471 0x0 SD (0)]
/ 62 (of 110)bad_stat_data: The objectid (1396472) is marked free, but
used by an object [1396442 1396472 0x0 SD (0)]
bad_stat_data: The objectid (1396474) is marked free, but used by an
object [1396442 1396474 0x0 SD (0)]
bad_stat_data: The objectid (1396476) is marked free, but used by an
object [1396442 1396476 0x0 SD (0)]
bad_stat_data: The objectid (1396477) is marked free, but used by an
object [1396442 1396477 0x0 SD (0)]
bad_stat_data: The objectid (1396478) is marked free, but used by an
object [1396442 1396478 0x0 SD (0)]
bad_stat_data: The objectid (1396479) is marked free, but used by an
object [1396442 1396479 0x0 SD (0)]
/ 63 (of 110)bad_stat_data: The objectid (1396481) is marked free, but
used by an object [1396442 1396481 0x0 SD (0)]
bad_stat_data: The objectid (1396486) is marked free, but used by an
object [1396442 1396486 0x0 SD (0)]
bad_stat_data: The objectid (1396487) is marked free, but used by an
object [1396442 1396487 0x0 SD (0)]
bad_stat_data: The objectid (1396488) is marked free, but used by an
object [1396442 1396488 0x0 SD (0)]
bad_stat_data: The objectid (1396490) is marked free, but used by an
object [1396442 1396490 0x0 SD (0)]
bad_stat_data: The objectid (1396493) is marked free, but used by an
object [1396442 1396493 0x0 SD (0)]
finished
Comparing bitmaps..vpf-10640: The on-disk and the correct bitmaps differs.
Checking Semantic tree:
finished
50 found corruptions can be fixed when running with --fix-fixable
###########
reiserfsck finished at Tue Feb  8 14:15:33 2011
###########

Il a l'air de me dire qu'il faut que je lance

# reiserfsck --fix-fixable /dev/sdc1

Non ?

Merci,

Franck.


Reply to: