[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Debian] Priorität vom Package at



On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 06:19:21AM +0200, Janto Trappe wrote:
> # apt-cache show at
> [...]
> Priority: important
> [...]
> 
> Aus "Priority: important" schliesse ich, dass at unbedigt benoetigt
> wird. Es ist eben Wichtig. Wird at den ueberhaupt standardmaessig
> vom System bzw. von irgendeinem Packet benutzt? AFAIK nicht.

falsch.

> Meine Frage also: Warum hat at die Priorität "important"?

aus dem debian-policy 2.2. Priorities:
...
     `important'
          Important programs, including those which one would expect to
          find on any Unix-like system.  If the expectation is that an
          experienced Unix person who found it missing would say `What the
          F*!@<+ is going on, where is `foo'', it must be in `important'.
          This is an important criterion because we are trying to produce,
          amongst other things, a free Unix.  Other packages without which
          the system will not run well or be usable must also be here.
          This does _not_ include Emacs, the X Window System, TeX or any
          other large applications.  The `important' packages are just a
          bare minimum of commonly-expected and necessary tools.
...


Gruss
Grisu
-- 
Michael Bramer  -  a Debian Linux Developer http://www.debian.org
PGP: finger grisu@db.debian.org  -- Linux Sysadmin   -- Use Debian Linux
The UNIX Guru's view of Sex:         unzip ; strip ; touch ; finger ;
mount ; fsck ; more ; yes ; umount ; sleep

Attachment: pgpCdJktbE2pM.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: