On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 06:19:21AM +0200, Janto Trappe wrote:
> # apt-cache show at
> [...]
> Priority: important
> [...]
>
> Aus "Priority: important" schliesse ich, dass at unbedigt benoetigt
> wird. Es ist eben Wichtig. Wird at den ueberhaupt standardmaessig
> vom System bzw. von irgendeinem Packet benutzt? AFAIK nicht.
falsch.
> Meine Frage also: Warum hat at die Priorität "important"?
aus dem debian-policy 2.2. Priorities:
...
`important'
Important programs, including those which one would expect to
find on any Unix-like system. If the expectation is that an
experienced Unix person who found it missing would say `What the
F*!@<+ is going on, where is `foo'', it must be in `important'.
This is an important criterion because we are trying to produce,
amongst other things, a free Unix. Other packages without which
the system will not run well or be usable must also be here.
This does _not_ include Emacs, the X Window System, TeX or any
other large applications. The `important' packages are just a
bare minimum of commonly-expected and necessary tools.
...
Gruss
Grisu
--
Michael Bramer - a Debian Linux Developer http://www.debian.org
PGP: finger grisu@db.debian.org -- Linux Sysadmin -- Use Debian Linux
The UNIX Guru's view of Sex: unzip ; strip ; touch ; finger ;
mount ; fsck ; more ; yes ; umount ; sleep
Attachment:
pgpQka0koL2U_.pgp
Description: PGP signature