Re: Re: potato->woody ==portmapper problems
It seems portmapper is part of base/netbase. wich is
installed.
midgaard:~# apt-get install portmapper
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
E: Couldn't find package portmapper
midgaard:~# apt-get install netbase
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Sorry, netbase is already the newest version
0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 211 not upgraded.
midgaard:~#
thanks
Andreas
On Sun, 14 Jan 2001 06:57:52 +0800 (WST) Lindsay Allen <allen@cbcfreo.wa.edu.au> wrote:
>
> Short answer:-
>
> apt-get install portmapper
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, 13 Jan 2001, Andreas Boman wrote:
>
> > Hello people,
> >
> > I just upgraded my system to woody, and everything seems to
> > run fine exept I can't get fam (file alteration manager) to
> > work now.
> >
> > I get the following error:
> > "Cannot register service: RPC: Unable to receive; errno =
> > Connection refused fam[10940]: can't register with
> > portmapper."
> >
> > My inetd.conf looks like it has been slightly mangeled by
> > the upgrade, but I am unsure of how it is 'supposed' to look
> > like, the line concerning fam is OK though.
> > (sgi_fam/1-2 stream rpc/tcp wait root /usr/local/bin/fam
> > fam)
> >
> > the entry in /etc/rpc is ok too:
> > sgi_fam 391002 fam
> >
> > I suspect that there is a really simple/stupid solution to
> > this, but I don't really know anything about rpc or
> > portmapper. I am also very new to Debian, only having used
> > Potato for about 2 days before I wanted to get Woody...
> >
> > thanks for any help.
> >
> > Andreas
> >
> >
> > --
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
> > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> >
> >
>
>
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> Lindsay Allen <allen@cleo.murdoch.edu.au> Perth, Western Australia
> voice +61 8 9316 2486, 0403 272 564 32.0125S 115.8445E Debian Linux
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>
>
Reply to: